2 years of
Experience
Many parents who seek out assessments for their child have probably already been told “not to worry” - from a teacher saying their child will be fine in time; from relatives claiming children are simply behaving this way today; from family members suggesting stricter rules; less screen time; or transferring to another school. However, despite being told there should be no reason to continue worrying, many parents continue to feel anxious because they believe they are observing something happening at home that other people do not see.
Some of the reasons why parents may feel concerned include:
Concern over concentration issues: spending too much time on homework (three hours versus one hour); having trouble remembering instruction given during the day; writing the same comments in their school diary each week.
Fear: experiencing abdominal pains every Monday morning before school; crying when dropped off at school; refusing to answer a shopkeeper’s question.
Puzzle: appearing intelligent and able to discuss most topics well, yet unable to read aloud a short paragraph without struggling.
There is psychological assessment designed specifically for this type of scenario. Assessment provides parents with factual data rather than relying on intuition. Assessments allow psychologists to determine what aspect(s) of learning difficulties are causing the problems experienced by a student. The assistance provided to a child can then be directed toward helping that child overcome those specific areas.
Unlike some forms of testing, psychological testing does not consist of just one single test. Instead, psychological testing involves a pre-planned series of standardized processes selected by the psychologist based upon information they have obtained from interviewing you about your concerns. There are commonly several elements included within the evaluation process, which may involve:
History of pregnancy/birth
Developmental milestones
Medical background
Sleep patterns
Temperament
The history of the current problem
Standardized tests evaluating cognitive abilities (intelligence), attention span, memory, and processing speed
Academic skills evaluations (reading fluency, reading comprehension, spelling, written expression, mathematics)
Behavioural rating scale results completed separately by both the parents and the child's teachers.
Self-report ratings for the child, if age appropriate
Observations conducted during the assessment process - i.e., the manner in which the child approaches tasks perceived as difficult; his/her ability to accept frustration; response to encouragement.
Assessment is typically spread across two or three sittings so that the child is not fatigued. Most children find it manageable.
Observation alone won't give you a clear picture of why a behavior exists. A student who is inattentive while studying in class could have ADHD; it also could indicate the student's anxiety, has a reading disorder that isn't diagnosed yet, doesn't get enough rest every night, or studies through material in a foreign language. These behaviors all appear the same from the back of a room.
Why this matters is that the interventions vary greatly. Behavioral strategies to support students with ADHD would not address a student whose primary issue is their separation anxiety, nor would strategies to teach a student to read support a student struggling to pay attention. It's through assessment that we determine whether the behaviors exhibited by students are due to ADHD, or some other condition.
According to ICD-11, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is defined as a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a long-term (at least six months) pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity. Inattention manifests itself as difficulty maintaining concentration on tasks that do not provide immediate rewards, distraction by irrelevant stimuli, poor organization skills, and frequent misplacement of items. Hyperactivity manifests itself as excessive physical movement and difficulties with remaining stationary in situations requiring self-regulation. Impulsivity demonstrates itself as impulsive responses to environmental stimuli without considering potential consequences.
There are three criteria found in ICD-11 that are easy to miss when assessing for ADHD formally. First, symptoms must exist prior to age twelve. Second, symptoms must occur in more than one environment, such as both home and school, rather than occurring in only one. Third, the severity of symptoms must be greater than would be expected for a child of that child's age and level of intellectual functioning, which cannot be determined without evaluating the child's intellectual functioning.
Therefore, assessments for ADHD include cognitive evaluations to identify the child's intellectual base line, performance-based assessments of sustained attention and impulse control, and rating forms filled out by parents and teachers separately to assess cross-situational manifestation rather than assuming it. A developmental history helps establish the age of symptom onset. Assessments for anxiety disorders, learning disabilities, sleep disturbances, and hearing loss help rule out many common conditions that resemble ADHD.
Children usually do not state directly that they are anxious. In the ICD-11 classification system, anxiety and fear-related disorders are combined into two categories and several disorders within those categories occur frequently in children including:
Separation Anxiety Disorder (6B05): Separating from a caregiver or a familiar person.
Social Anxiety Disorder (6B04): Fear of social interactions.
Specific Phobia (6B03): Unreasonable fear of something.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (6B00): Generalized excessive worry about everything.
Selective Mutism (6B06): Normal speech at home but consistently does not talk at school.
What parents typically see is different from what the diagnosis describes. Common manifestations of anxiety in children include irritable mood, angry mood, refusal or reluctance to attend school, frequent complaints of headache or abdominal pain with no identifiable medical cause, difficulty initiating sleep, nightmares, seeking constant reassurance, clinging to familiar objects or people, and avoiding unfamiliar environments. Due to these appearing similar to defiant or attention-seeking behaviors, anxious children are often punished for an uncontrollable condition.
An assessment of anxiety utilizes age-appropriate self-report questionnaires that allow children to express feelings they are unable to articulate verbally, parallel parent-report methods, and semi-structured interviews. Younger children utilize drawings and play based-tasks to begin discussion rather than diagnosis. The intent of the assessment is to establish which type of anxiety exists and therefore what treatment strategy should be employed next, and to document baseline levels of severity so that response to treatment can be quantitatively assessed.
According to ICD-11, there are developmental learning disorders and subtypes of reading, writing and math. Those are typically referred as dyslexia, dysgraphia and dyscalculia. The key characteristic of developmental learning disorders is the fact that the child's performance in the relevant area(s) is substantially lower than would be anticipated based on the child's chronological age and overall cognitive abilities. In addition, the difficulties should persist over time (i.e., continue throughout school), and interfere with educational development.
In most cases parents identify a gap prior to identifying a specific name for the problem. For example, the child can follow a complicated story being read aloud but cannot decipher a short paragraph. Spelling continues to be irregular after many years of practice. The student is able to write much less than he/she can say orally. Math facts learned on Monday are lost by Thursday. Reading is very laborious and requires great effort although accuracy exists.
Assessments begin by assessing the individual's intellectual ability followed by separate assessments of each academic domain relative to age norms, and assess the underlying process that support those academic domains such as phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming, working memory, and processing speed. A learning disorder will not be identified if the difficulties are better explained by intellectual disability, uncorrected visual/hearing impairments, a neurological disorder, interrupted/insufficient education, environmental psychosocial adversities, or language proficiency.
Assessment test scores alone do not determine a diagnosis. Test scores represent only one element of the data collected.
It is possible for a child to receive low test scores due to factors unrelated to a learning disorder. Examples include lack of sleep, illness, fear of testing environment, unfamiliarity with timed assessment formats, or a decision to refuse cooperation during testing.
A gifted child with a legitimate learning disorder may develop sufficient compensatory strategies to obtain average-range test scores yet struggle academically daily. Scores without consideration of other clinical elements may misrepresent either direction.
Case history including prenatal/delivery, developmental milestones, medical illnesses/head injuries/seizures/thyroid function/sleep patterns/current medications.
Family history - Learning disorders/ADHD are highly heritable and a parent frequently identifies similarities with their own childhood experiences.
School record review spanning multiple years documenting duration versus onset of difficulties.
Psychosocial information including death/bereavement/conflict/divorce/relocation/changing schools/bullying/home disruptions in past year.
Vision/hearing status verification versus assumptions
Clinician observations regarding the child across multiple sessions.
Clinical judgment provides cohesion among these components by determining which aspects of the evaluation are clinically significant, artifacts of the testing context and/or how best to proceed when the evaluation presents conflicting findings. Additionally, clinical judgment recognizes that comorbidity (co-existing conditions) is commonplace rather than extraordinary.